The Timing of COVID-19 Transmission (preprint)

Background: The timing of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is a critical factor to understand the epidemic trajectory and the impact of isolation, contact tracing and other non-pharmaceutical interventions on the spread of COVID-19 epidemics. Methods: We examined the distribution of transmission event times with respect to exposure and onset of symptoms. We analysed 119 transmission pairs with known date of onset of symptoms for both index and secondary cases and partial information on their intervals of exposure. We inferred the distribution for generation time and time from onset of symptoms to transmission by maximum likelihood. We modelled different relations between time of infection, onset of symptoms and transmission, inferring the most appropriate one according to the Akaike Information Criterion. Finally, we estimated the fraction of pre-symptomatic and early symptomatic transmissions among all pairs using a Bayesian approach.Findings: For symptomatic individuals, the timing of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was more directly linked to the onset of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 than to the time since infection. The time of transmission was approximately centered and symmetric around the onset of symptoms, with three quarters of events occurring in the window from 2-3 days before to 2-3 days after. The pre-symptomatic infectious period extended further back in time for individuals with longer incubation periods. Overall, the fraction of transmission from strictly pre-symptomatic infections was high (41%; 95%CI 31-50%), but a comparably large fraction of transmissions occurred on the same day as the onset of symptoms or the next day (35%; 95%CI 26-45%). We caution against overinterpretation of the fraction and timing of late symptomatic transmissions, due to their dependence on behavioural factors and interventions. Interpretation: Infectiousness is causally driven by the onset of symptoms. Public health authorities should reassess their policies on the contact tracing window in the light of individual variability in presymptomatic infectious period. Information about when a case was infected should be collected where possible, in order to assess how far into the past their contacts should be traced. The large fraction of transmission from strictly pre-symptomatic infections limits the efficacy of symptom-based interventions, while the large fraction of early symptomatic transmissions underlines the critical importance of individuals distancing themselves from others as soon as they notice any symptoms, even if mild. Rapid or at-home testing and contextual risk information could greatly facilitate efficient early isolation.Funding Statement: The study was funded by an award from the Li Ka Shing Foundation to CF.Declaration of Interests: None of the authors have competing financial or non-financial interests.

The timing of COVID-19 transmission (preprint)

The timing of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is a critical factor to understand the epidemic trajectory and the impact of isolation, contact tracing and other non- pharmaceutical interventions on the spread of COVID-19 epidemics. We examined the distribution of transmission events with respect to exposure and onset of symptoms. We show that for symptomatic individuals, the timing of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is more strongly linked to the onset of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 than to the time since infection. We found that it was approximately centered and symmetric around the onset of symptoms, with three quarters of events occurring in the window from 2-3 days before to 2-3 days after. However, we caution against overinterpretation of the right tail of the distribution, due to its dependence on behavioural factors and interventions. We also found that the pre-symptomatic infectious period extended further back in time for individuals with longer incubation periods. This strongly suggests that information about when a case was infected should be collected where possible, in order to assess how far into the past their contacts should be traced. Overall, the fraction of transmission from strictly pre-symptomatic infections was high (41%; 95%CI 31-50%), which limits the efficacy of symptom-based interventions, and the large fraction of transmissions (35%; 95%CI 26-45%) that occur on the same day or the day after onset of symptoms underlines the critical importance of individuals distancing themselves from others as soon as they notice any symptoms, even if they are mild. Rapid or at-home testing and contextual risk information would greatly facilitate efficient early isolation.

Ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 in Iran: challenges and signs of concern with under-reporting of prevalence and deaths (preprint)

Many countries with an early outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 struggled to gauge the size and start date of the epidemic mainly due to limited testing capacities and a large proportion of undetected asymptomatic and mild infections. Iran was among the first countries with a major outbreak outside China. Using all genomic sequences collected from patients with a travel link to Iran, we estimate that the epidemic started on 21/01/2020 (95% HPD: 05/12/2019 – 14/02/2020) with a doubling time of 3 days (95% HPD: 1.68 – 16.27). We also show, using air travel data from confirmed exported cases, that from late February to early March the number of active cases across the country were more than a hundred times higher than the reported cases at the time. A detailed province-level analysis of all-cause mortality shows 20,718 (CI 95%: 18,859 – 22,576) excess deaths during winter and spring 2020 compared to previous years, almost twice the number of reported COVID-19-related deaths at the time. Correcting for under-reporting of prevalence and deaths, we use an SEIR model to reconstruct the outbreak dynamics in Iran. Our model forecasted the second epidemic peak and suggests that by 14/07/2020 a total of 9M (CI 95%: 118K – 44M) have recovered from the disease across the country. These findings have profound implications for assessing the stage of the epidemic in Iran and shed light on the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in Iran and central Asia despite significant levels of under-reporting. 

Ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 in Iran: challenges and signs of concern (preprint)

Since the first outbreak in China, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread around the world. Iran was one of the first countries outside of China to report infections with COVID-19. With nearly 100 exported cases to various other countries, it has since been the epicentre of the outbreak in the Middle east. By examining the age-stratified COVID-19 case fatality rates across the country and 14 university hospitals in Tehran, we find that, in younger age groups, the reported cases on 13/03/2020 only capture less than 10% of symptomatic cases in the population. This indicates significant levels of under-reporting in Iran. Using the 18 full-genome sequences from cases with a travel history or link to Iran, as well as the one full genome sequence obtained from within the country, we estimate the time to the most recent common ancestor of sequences which suggests the likely start of the outbreak on 21/01/2020 (95% HPD: 05/12/2019 - 14/02/2020) with an approximate doubling time of 3.07 (95% HPD: 1.68 - 16.27). Also, based on known exported cases to Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon, and China, we estimate the outbreak size on 25 February and 6 March to be around 13,700 (95% CI: 7,600 - 33,300) and 60,500 (43,200 - 209,200), respectively. Knowing the size of the outbreak at two time points and the typical doubling times associated with the COVID-19 epidemics in countries across Europe and North America, we can independently verify that the likely start of epidemic in Iran is around 15/01/2020 (27/12/2019 - 24/01/2020). Our assessment of the fate of the epidemic based on current levels of non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented by the government suggests upward of 10 million cases (IQR: 6.7M - 18M) and 100,000 ICU beds required (IQR: 77K - 140K) during the peak of the epidemic with more than 100,000 cumulative deaths (IQR: 180K - 240K). We also predict a peak in demand for ICU beds on 21/04/2020 (IQR: 06/04/2020 - 23/05/2020). The large span of the peak of the ICU demand is a result of two separate peaks, with the first occurring at around 15/4/2020 and the second in approximately a months time. The latter is also expected to last longer and is based on the relatively relaxed social distancing measures in place. The exact magnitude and timing of the peaks strictly depends on levels of interventions and can change significantly upon new information or change of policy. We caution that a lack of, or relaxed, stringent intervention measures, during a period of highly under-reported spread, would likely lead to the healthcare system becoming overwhelmed in the next few months.

Evaluating COVID-19 Public Health Messaging in Italy: Self-Reported Compliance and Growing Mental Health Concerns (preprint)

Purpose: The COVID-19 death-rate in Italy continues to climb, surpassing that in every other country. We implement one of the first nationally representative surveys about this unprecedented public health crisis and use it to evaluate the Italian government's public health efforts and citizen responses. Findings: (1) Public health messaging is being heard. At this point, the Italian people understand how to keep themselves and others safe from the SARS-Cov-2 virus. This is true for all population groups we studied, with the partial exception of slightly lower compliance among young adults. Remarkably, even those who do not trust the government, and those who think the government has been untruthful about the crisis mostly believe the public health message and claim to be acting in accordance. (2) The quarantine is beginning to have serious negative effects on the population's mental health. Policy Recommendations: Public health messaging is being heard and understood. The focus now should move from explaining that citizens should stay at home to what they can do at home. We need interventions that make staying at home and following public health protocols more desirable, or possibly even fun. These interventions could include virtual social interactions, such as online social reading activities, classes, exercise routines, among others - all designed to reduce the boredom of being socially isolated for long periods of time and to increase the attractiveness of following public health recommendations. Interventions like these will grow in importance as the crisis wears on around the world, and staying inside wears on people.